Abstract

All of Africa’s emerging economies are faced with developmental challenges, which can be partly ameliorated using effective University–Industry technology transfer. While technology transfer remains at the infant stage, sparsely documented, and with no complex ongoing processes in many African societies, Universities in Africa are making efforts in University–Industry collaborations aimed at bringing significant improvements to the continent in a bid to drive national innovation and regional economic development. In this paper, we attempt to evaluate the progress made so far by Nigerian Universities in technological innovation transfer, in order to suggest ways for possible future progress. To do this, crucial technology transfer resource factors (inputs), namely, the number of linkage projects funded by the “African Research Council” (ARC), consortium membership of the University’s technology transfer office, and the number of doctoral staff at the University’s technology transfer office, were checked against a set of performance measures (number of executed licenses, amount of licensing royalty income, number of spin-offs created, and the number of spin-offs created with university equity), using data envelopment analysis and multiple regression, respectively. Results suggest that Universities that possess better resource factors reported higher outputs on most of the performance indicators applied. In addition, it was observed that Universities with greater ability to effectively transfer knowledge had higher technology commercialization performance and financial sustainability. The implication of these results is that Universities in Africa need to develop in line with the technology transfer resource (input) factors suggested within this study, as this is the way to go for better performance.

Highlights

  • Globalization puts emerging nations under enormous pressure to rebuild themselves using technology in an attempt to keep up with global sustainability and economic trends (Bozeman 2000; De Moortel and Crispeels 2018)

  • The controlled phase definition says that a technology transfer office should have adequate human resources with the right types of abilities, royalties, or reward systems in location for bureau technology transfer employees, developed networks, or connections between university and industry, subsequently revealed innovations, and a decentralized inner framework

  • If Technology Transfer Offices (TTOs) alpha does not satisfy any of these criteria, the divisions that need action are the ones selected

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Globalization puts emerging nations under enormous pressure to rebuild themselves using technology in an attempt to keep up with global sustainability and economic trends (Bozeman 2000; De Moortel and Crispeels 2018). Universities play important roles in the transfer of technology. This is because the process of learning and acquisition of new knowledge has been the foundation for most ground-breaking inventions across all spheres of life (Giuri et al 2019; De Moortel and Crispeels 2018). Recent years have seen universities’ basic roles evolve to include collaborations with industry, to add to the traditional missions of teaching and research. This is further justified by Osabutey and Jin (2016), who explained that universities in contemporary times are required to play multi-faceted roles: teaching, research and entrepreneurial functions

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call