Abstract

It has been shown that mechanical ventilation in patients with, or at high-risk for, the development of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) can be a double-edged sword. If the mechanical breath is improperly set, it can amplify the lung injury associated with ARDS, causing a secondary ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI). Conversely, the mechanical breath can be adjusted to minimize VILI, which can reduce ARDS mortality. The current standard of care ventilation strategy to minimize VILI attempts to reduce alveolar over-distension and recruitment-derecruitment (R/D) by lowering tidal volume (Vt) to 6 cc/kg combined with adjusting positive-end expiratory pressure (PEEP) based on a sliding scale directed by changes in oxygenation. Thus, Vt is often but not always set as a “one-size-fits-all” approach and although PEEP is often set arbitrarily at 5 cmH2O, it may be personalized according to changes in a physiologic parameter, most often to oxygenation. However, there is evidence that oxygenation as a method to optimize PEEP is not congruent with the PEEP levels necessary to maintain an open and stable lung. Thus, optimal PEEP might not be personalized to the lung pathology of an individual patient using oxygenation as the physiologic feedback system. Multiple methods of personalizing PEEP have been tested and include dead space, lung compliance, lung stress and strain, ventilation patterns using computed tomography (CT) or electrical impedance tomography (EIT), inflection points on the pressure/volume curve (P/V), and the slope of the expiratory flow curve using airway pressure release ventilation (APRV). Although many studies have shown that personalizing PEEP is possible, there is no consensus as to the optimal technique. This review will assess various methods used to personalize PEEP, directed by physiologic parameters, necessary to adaptively adjust ventilator settings with progressive changes in lung pathophysiology.

Highlights

  • It has been shown that mechanical ventilation in patients with, or at high-risk for, the development of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) can be a double-edged sword

  • It is clear that a high level of dynamic strain caused by alveolar R/D is a major mechanism of lung tissue damage associated with ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI)

  • Early positive-end expiratory pressure (PEEP) application has been effective at reducing the complication associated with mechanical ventilation in both animal and human studies

Read more

Summary

Introduction

It has been shown that mechanical ventilation in patients with, or at high-risk for, the development of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) can be a double-edged sword. Optimization of the protective mechanical breath could be achieved if a closed-loop feedback system existed, in which the physician analyzes changes in lung physiology and uses this as feedback to adjust ventilator settings, with the goal to maintain an open and stable lung regardless of the degree of lung pathology (Fig. 1) [10, 11] Since both alveolar opening and collapse time constants vary depending on lung injury severity and evolve as the lung pathology improves or deteriorates, ventilator settings must be constantly adjusted to fit the specific needs of the individual [12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19]. Setting the ideal PEEP to stabilize the lung is an important parameter in reducing VILI and will be the focus of this review, it must be remembered that the entire MBP must be adjusted properly to maximize lung protection

Methods
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call