Abstract

Brain temperature is an important yet understudied medical parameter, and increased brain temperature after injury is associated with worse patient outcomes. The scarcity of methods for measuring brain temperature non-invasively motivates the need for computational models enabling predictions when clinical measurements are challenging. Here, we develop a biophysical model based on the first principles of energy and mass conservation that uses data from magnetic resonance imaging of individual brain tissue and vessel structure to facilitate personalized brain temperature predictions. We compare model-predicted 3D thermal distributions with experimental temperature measured using whole brain magnetic resonance-based thermometry. We find brain thermometry maps predicted by the model capture unique spatial variations for each subject, which are in agreement with experimentally-measured temperatures. As medicine becomes more personalized, this foundational study provides a framework to develop an individualized approach for brain temperature predictions.

Highlights

  • Brain temperature is an important yet understudied medical parameter, and increased brain temperature after injury is associated with worse patient outcomes

  • Most studies of chemical shift thermometry rely on single-voxel magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) or multi-voxel chemical shift imaging, but recent advances have demonstrated whole-brain thermometry using echo planar spectroscopic imaging (EPSI)[37,38]

  • Given that both magnetic resonance (MR) thermometry and implanted probes suggest temperature may vary within brain regions and across subjects, a biophysical model that can predict this variability would be of immediate utility

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Brain temperature is an important yet understudied medical parameter, and increased brain temperature after injury is associated with worse patient outcomes. No approaches have been developed that account for individual variations in metabolism, vessel structure, and blood flow, which can vary widely, resulting in brain temperature predictions that are of generic value and are not subject-specific. Given that both MR thermometry and implanted probes suggest temperature may vary within brain regions and across subjects, a biophysical model that can predict this variability would be of immediate utility

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call