Abstract
BackgroundTranscatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) can be complicated with a complete atrioventricular block requiring permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation. The cost of index hospitalization for such patients is higher than usual. However, the magnitude of this increased cost is uncertain. We have looked at our five-year TAVR experience to analyze the detailed cost for PPM implantation in TAVR.MethodsThis study is a retrospective analysis of patients undergoing TAVR at our tertiary care center from December 2012 to April 2018. The initial sample size was 449. We excluded patients with prior PPM or an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (37). Patients who had their procedure aborted or required a cardiopulmonary bypass (16) and those with missing data variables (14) were excluded. The final sample size was 382. The cost for admission was calculated as the US dollars incurred by the hospital. Cohort costs were categorized as a direct cost, which is patient based, and an indirect cost, which represents overhead costs and is independent of patient volume. Patients were divided into two groups based on the placement of PPM after TAVR. Chi-square test, t-test, and logistic linear regression were used for the statistical analysis.ResultsOf 382 patients, 19 (4.9%) required PPM after TAVR. Baseline variables, including age, gender, and BMI, were not statistically significant. The PPM group had a significantly longer intensive care unit (ICU) stay (48.6 hours vs. 36.7 hours; p<0.001) and total stay in the hospital (4.2 days vs. 3.4 days; p=0.047). PPM implantation after TAVR increased cost on an average of $10,213 more than a typical TAVR admission (p=0.04). The direct cost was also significantly high for the PPM group ($7,087; p=0.02). On detailed analysis, almost all major cost categories showed a higher cost for pacemaker patients when compared with control.ConclusionsPPM implantation adds a significant cost burden to TAVR admissions.
Highlights
Aortic stenosis is an insidious disease with a long latency period, followed by rapid progression after the appearance of symptoms, resulting in a high rate of death among untreated patients
We have looked at our fiveyear Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) experience to analyze the detailed cost for permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation in TAVR
Almost all major cost categories showed a higher cost for pacemaker patients when compared with control
Summary
Aortic stenosis is an insidious disease with a long latency period, followed by rapid progression after the appearance of symptoms, resulting in a high rate of death (approximately 50% in the first two years after symptoms appear) among untreated patients. When compared with SAVR, TAVR has demonstrated improved three-year clinical outcomes, including allcause mortality, in the incidence of stroke and aortic valve hemodynamics [7]. These benefits can be offset by a much higher permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation rate of 5%-25%, as SAVR has a PPM implantation rate of 1% per year [8]. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) can be complicated with a complete atrioventricular block requiring permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation.
Published Version (Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have