Abstract

There is a well-established historical observation that structural joint damage by plain X-ray correlates poorly with symptomatic disease in osteoarthritis (OA). This is often attributed to the inability to visualise soft-tissue pathology within the joint and the recognition of heterogeneous patient factors that drive central pain sensitisation. A major issue is the relative paucity of mechanistic studies in which molecular pathogenesis of pain is interrogated in relation to tissue pathology. Nonetheless, in recent years, three broad approaches have been deployed to attempt to address this: correlative clinical studies of peripheral and central pain outcomes using magnetic resonance imaging, where soft-tissue processes can be visualised; molecular studies on tissue from patients with OA; and careful molecular interrogation of preclinical models of OA across the disease time course. Studies have taken advantage of established clinical molecular targets such as nerve growth factor. Not only is the regulation of nerve growth factor within the joint being used to explore the relationship between tissue pathology and the origins of pain in OA, but it also provides a core model on which other molecules present within the joint can modulate the pain response. In this narrative review, how molecular and pathological tissue change relates to joint pain in OA will be discussed. Finally, a model for how tissue damage may lead to pain over the disease course will be proposed.

Highlights

  • The study of structural and symptomatic disease in osteoarthritis (OA) has been thwarted by having blunt tools on both sides.[6]

  • In 2010, in a candidate molecule approach, we identified nerve growth factor (NGF) as a pain target in murine OA after DMM.[67]

  • The drivers of NGF in each case were shown to be different; postoperative pain being inhibited by neutralising tumour necrosis factor (TNF), and the late phase seemingly independent of inflammation

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The study of structural and symptomatic disease in osteoarthritis (OA) has been thwarted by having blunt tools on both sides.[6] Plain radiographs (X-rays) are only able to visualise 2-dimensional radiopaque structures, so are good for assessing gross changes in bone shape, osteophyte size, chondrocalcinosis, subchondral bone sclerosis, and bone cysts. Many tools have been developed and validated over the years to assess patient- and physicianreported measures of pain, but these are limited by their subjectivity and necessarily complicated when trying to capture the quality and pattern of different types of pain at different times. It is hardly surprising that our ability to relate clinical pain outcomes with structural change has been challenging

The course of pain in human osteoarthritis
The course of pain-like behaviour in rodent osteoarthritis
Nerve growth factor as a pain target in human and murine osteoarthritis
The role of the synovium in osteoarthritis pain
The role of the bone in osteoarthritis pain
The role of cartilage in osteoarthritis pain
Summary—the origin of peripheral osteoarthritis pain—a new model emerging
Findings
Conflict of interest statement
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call