Periodic vaccination for post-pandemic management: Insights from and planning beyond COVID-19

Abstract

Waning immunity to the SARS-CoV-2 virus and the inevitability of viral mutations necessitate a large-scale periodic revaccination program. Rapid mass vaccination may quickly suppress an epidemic, but it may have an unintended downstream effect of creating a surge in population susceptibility later when vaccinated people lose their immunity all at the same time. To test this hypothesis, we conducted a simulation study comparing pulse vaccination, the repeated administration of “booster” vaccines in large pulses occurring at fixed intervals, and constant vaccination, the continuous administration of booster vaccines at a slower, constant pace. We showed that constant vaccination can maintain population susceptibility and therefore incident deaths at a constant, manageable level; while pulse vaccination can induce large recurrent epidemics. The advantage of constant vaccination is only realized, however, in a post-pandemic scenario when a high level of population immunity has already been attained through a combination of vaccination and natural infection. At the beginning of a novel pandemic, aggressive vaccination is recommended to prioritize immediate protection over long-term protection. In a counterfactual analysis, we showed that prematurely switching to constant vaccination would have significantly increased the disease burden during the Delta variant wave in August 2021.