Abstract
This essay considers polyvalent meanings of fresh water and the gendered dynamics of menstrual blood and porous, gendered bodies in the history of interpretation of Mark 5:24–35. Drawing upon a hydrosocial, anti-colonial, intersectional feminist hermeneutic, this essay articulates intersections among the uneven contemporary menstrual burdens associated with insufficient fresh water supply, indicates how gendered and racialized medicine and public health figure into these dynamics, and offers a robust alternative to the dominant history of biblical interpretation usually applied to the Mark 5 pericope of the hemorrhaging woman.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
