Abstract

Over the past decade, short-read sequence alignment has become a mature technology. Optimized algorithms, careful software engineering and high-speed hardware have contributed to greatly increased throughput and accuracy. With these improvements, many opportunities for performance optimization have emerged. In this review, we examine three general-purpose short-read alignment tools-BWA-MEM, Bowtie 2 and Arioc-with a focus on performance optimization. We analyze the performance-related behavior of the algorithms and heuristics each tool implements, with the goal of arriving at practical methods of improving processing speed and accuracy. We indicate where an aligner's default behavior may result in suboptimal performance, explore the effects of computational constraints such as end-to-end mapping and alignment scoring threshold, and discuss sources of imprecision in the computation of alignment scores and mapping quality. With this perspective, we describe an approach to tuning short-read aligner performance to meet specific data-analysis and throughput requirements while avoiding potential inaccuracies in subsequent analysis of alignment results. Finally, we illustrate how this approach avoids easily overlooked pitfalls and leads to verifiable improvements in alignment speed and accuracy. richard.wilton@jhu.edu. Appendices referenced in this article are available at Bioinformatics online.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call