Abstract

An algorithm derived from machine learning uses the arterial waveform to predict intraoperative hypotension some minutes before episodes, possibly giving clinician’s time to intervene and prevent hypotension. Whether the Hypotension Prediction Index works well with noninvasive arterial pressure waveforms remains unknown. We therefore evaluated sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value of the Index based on non-invasive arterial waveform estimates. We used continuous hemodynamic data measured from ClearSight (formerly Nexfin) noninvasive finger blood pressure monitors in surgical patients. We re-evaluated data from a trial that included 320 adults ≥ 45 years old designated ASA physical status 3 or 4 who had moderate-to-high-risk non-cardiac surgery with general anesthesia. We calculated sensitivity and specificity for predicting hypotension, defined as mean arterial pressure ≤ 65 mmHg for at least 1 min, and characterized the relationship with receiver operating characteristics curves. We also evaluated the number of hypotensive events at various ranges of the Hypotension Prediction Index. And finally, we calculated the positive predictive value for hypotension episodes when the Prediction Index threshold was 85. The algorithm predicted hypotension 5 min in advance, with a sensitivity of 0.86 [95% confidence interval 0.82, 0.89] and specificity 0.86 [0.82, 0.89]. At 10 min, the sensitivity was 0.83 [0.79, 0.86] and the specificity was 0.83 [0.79, 0.86]. And at 15 min, the sensitivity was 0.75 [0.71, 0.80] and the specificity was 0.75 [0.71, 0.80]. The positive predictive value of the algorithm prediction at an Index threshold of 85 was 0.83 [0.79, 0.87]. A Hypotension Prediction Index of 80–89 provided a median of 6.0 [95% confidence interval 5.3, 6.7] minutes warning before mean arterial pressure decreased to < 65 mmHg. The Hypotension Prediction Index, which was developed and validated with invasive arterial waveforms, predicts intraoperative hypotension reasonably well from non-invasive estimates of the arterial waveform. Hypotension prediction, along with appropriate management, can potentially reduce intraoperative hypotension. Being able to use the non-invasive pressure waveform will widen the range of patients who might benefit.Clinical Trial Number: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02872896.

Highlights

  • The association between hypotension and serious complications and mortality in non-cardiac surgical patients is well established [1,2,3,4,5,6,7]

  • An algorithm (Hypotension Prediction Index, HPI) based on machine learning was developed which predicts intraoperative hypotension with a sensitivity and specificity of 88% [95% confidence intervals 85, 90%] and 87% [85, 90%] 15 min before a hypotensive event

  • For this post hoc analysis, we used hemodynamic data measured by noninvasive finger cuff monitors (ClearSight, Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA) in patients enrolled in a randomized trial of continuous noninvasive blood pressure monitoring during noncardiac surgery

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The association between hypotension and serious complications and mortality in non-cardiac surgical patients is well established [1,2,3,4,5,6,7]. Even better would be to predict hypotension, allowing the clinicians time to intervene and potentially moderate or even prevent hypotension. An algorithm (Hypotension Prediction Index, HPI) based on machine learning was developed which predicts intraoperative hypotension (defined as mean arterial pressure < 65 mmHg sustained at least a minute) with a sensitivity and specificity of 88% [95% confidence intervals 85, 90%] and 87% [85, 90%] 15 min before a hypotensive event. The HPI algorithm better predicted hypotension than commonly used hemodynamic parameters trends including mean arterial pressure, stroke volume, and cardiac output [10]. Development and testing of this algorithm was based on invasive arterial line waveform data. Only a small fraction of patients having noncardiac surgery require invasive arterial monitoring

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call