Abstract

The objective is to assess the performance of the 2023 American College of Rheumatology/EULAR classification criteria (2023 AECC) for antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) in a Mexican cohort. We enrolled patients with primary APS (PAPS) and secondary APS (SAPS) and a control group of nonautoimmune thrombophilia. We evaluated the fulfillment of the 2023 AECC and the 2006 revised Sapporo classification criteria (2006 RSCC) and their performance against the clinical diagnosis as the gold standard. The baseline Global APS Score (GAPSS) and the Damage Index for APS (DIAPS) at last follow-up were calculated. We included 85 patients with PAPS, 54 with SAPS, and 50 with thrombophilia. According to the 2023 AECC criteria, 69 patients (81.2%) with PAPS, 28 patients (51.9%) with SAPS, and none of the patients with thrombophilia met the criteria. When comparing true positive (TP) (n = 69) versus false negative (n = 16) cases within the PAPS group, TP cases exhibited a higher frequency of thrombotic manifestations and IgM anti-cardiolipin and IgG anti-β2-glycoprotein-I positivity. For PAPS, there was a correlation between the 2023 AECC score and both GAPSS (rho = 0.621, P < 0.0001) and DIAPS scores (rho = 0.433, P < 0.0001). When comparing the 2023 AECC with the 2006 RSCC, a lower sensitivity (81.2% vs 88.2%) but a higher specificity (100.0% vs 92.0%) was observed for PAPS. Similar findings were observed in SAPS. In both PAPS and SAPS, the 2023 AECC have higher specificity than the 2006 RSCC. The main feature of patients with PAPS according to the 2023 AECC was thrombosis. These criteria might identify patients at higher risk of thrombosis and damage accrual.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.