Abstract

AbstractIn recent seismic analyses, it is considered that the structural damping ratio should be treated as independent of frequency, for safety side estimation. Therefore, frequency‐insensitive damping is required for realistic seismic simulations. This paper investigates the performance of various sparse matrix damping models (extended Raleigh, capped viscous and uniform damping) in the inelastic seismic analysis of a 35‐story moment‐frame steel building. These sparse matrix damping models were compared with Rayleigh, tangent Rayleigh, and Wilson‐Penzien (modal) damping models to provide insight into damping models suitable for large‐scale inelastic response history analysis (RHA). First, the necessity of frequency‐insensitive damping in large‐scale analysis is illustrated via numerical simulations. Then, the vibration characteristics with simultaneous inputs of horizontal and vertical ground motion are analyzed using the abovementioned damping schemes, and their results are compared. The comparisons are analyzed by focusing on horizontal displacement/acceleration, story drift angle, beam‐end ductility factor, the amplitude due to beam vibration, and the associated vertical acceleration. Finally, the computation speeds are compared. As a result, it is shown that although these sparse matrix damping models are practically useful, they are not yet sufficient and present challenges.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call