Abstract

ObjectiveThe performance of a new single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) scanner with a cadmium-zinc-telluride (CZT) solid-state semiconductor detector (Discovery NM 530c; D530c) was evaluated and compared to a conventional Anger-type SPECT with a dual-detector camera (Infinia).MethodsThree different phantom studies were performed. Full width at half maximum (FWHM) was measured using line sources placed at different locations in a cylindrical phantom. Uniformity was measured using cylindrical phantoms with 3 different diameters (80, 120, and 160 mm). Spatial resolution was evaluated using hot-rod phantoms of various diameters (5, 9, 13, 16, and 20 mm). Three different myocardial phantom studies were also performed, acquiring projection data with and without defects, and evaluating the interference of liver and gallbladder radioactivity. In a clinical study, the D530c employed list-mode raw data acquisition with electrocardiogram (ECG)-gated acquisition over a 10-min period. From the 10-min projection data, 1-, 3-, 5-, 7- and 10-min SPECT images were reconstructed.ResultsThe FWHM of the D503c was 1.73–3.48 mm (without water) and 3.88–6.64 mm (with water), whereas the FWHM of the Infinia was 8.17–12.63 mm (without water) and 15.48–16.28 mm (with water). Non-uniformity was larger for the D530c than for the Infinia. Truncation artifacts were also observed with the D530c in a Φ160 mm phantom. The contrast ratio, as defined by myocardial defect/non-defect ratio, was better for the D530c than for the Infinia, and the influence from liver and gallbladder radioactivities was less. Quantitative gated SPECT (QGS) software demonstrated significant differences between data captured over a 10-min period, relative to those acquired over periods of <5 min; there was no difference between ejection fractions calculated using data capture for periods ≥5 min (p < 0.05).ConclusionsThe D530c is superior to the Infinia, with regard to both spatial resolution and sensitivity. In this study, these advantages were confirmed by the myocardial phantom and in a clinical setting, using the QGS software.

Highlights

  • A recently released semiconductor detector for single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) offers several advantages over the conventional Anger-type SPECT

  • Quantitative gated SPECT (QGS) software demonstrated significant differences between data captured over a 10-min period, relative to those acquired over periods of \5 min; there was no difference between ejection fractions calculated using data capture for periods C5 min (p \ 0.05)

  • The D530c is superior to the Infinia, with regard to both spatial resolution and sensitivity

Read more

Summary

Introduction

A recently released semiconductor detector for single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) offers several advantages over the conventional Anger-type SPECT. Instruments of both types were compared in this evaluation, in conjunction with the necessary software, to perform quantitative gated SPECT (QGS) [1]. The guidelines recommend a 20–30 min acquisition time for conventional systems [2, 3]. The data acquisition method of the new SPECT scanner differs from that of conventional SPECT scanners in that it has a smaller field of view (FOV). We evaluated the spatial resolution and sensitivity (acquisition time for QGS) of a new SPECT scanner relative to a conventional instrument

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.