Abstract
The purpose of this research is to give empirical evidence of the impact of management commitment, resources, legislative mandate, management innovation, and reward/incentive on performance measurement. This research data was collected through a Google Form, in which 64 questionnaires were sent to the Head of the Planning Subdivision and their staff in each of the Regional Apparatus Organizations in the South Tangerang City Government. With the technique used, census sampling, this study took a quantitative approach employing non-probability sampling. Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) using PLS version 3.0 was used to evaluate the data. Management commitment and legislative mandate have a considerable impact on performance measurement. Meanwhile, resources, management innovation, and reward/incentive do not. This study has implications for local governments in terms of describing how performance measurement is carried out based on institutional factors, as well as making recommendations for improving local government performance measurements in the future to make them more reliable, effective, and efficient.
Highlights
The implementation of good government governance is a real requirement for every government to realize the aspirations of the people in achieving the goals of the nation and state
The results show that the management commitment (MC, = 2.787 and P = 0.006) and the legislative mandate (LM, = 2.118 and P = 0.035) affect the performance measurement, which means that H1 and H3 are accepted
The South Tangerang City Government underwent several tests connected to performance measurement that was influenced by management commitment, resources, legal mandates, management innovation, and awards/incentives
Summary
The implementation of good government governance (governance that is transparent, accountable, fair, effective, and efficient) is a real requirement for every government to realize the aspirations of the people in achieving the goals of the nation and state. We can see the government's efforts to improve the old government structure and achieve good governance in Law Number of 2004 concerning Regional Government and Law Number of 2004 concerning Financial Balance between the Central Government and Regional Governments. Both central and regional governments are competing to gain support from the community, one of which is by designing a performance measurement system as a form of accountability to the community. The Government Agency Performance Accountability Report (LAKIP), which is the ultimate outcome of the Government Agency Performance Accountability System (SAKIP), contains performance and results previously achieved on activities budgeted in the APBN/APBD in Indonesia's public sector. Reported from the belitungtimurkab.go.id website, namely the East Belitung Regency government website
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
