Abstract

The comparisons of an AE source location performance of two widely used methods, time of arrival (TOA) and difference of arrival time (DOAT) have been analyzed in a complex planar multilayered surface. The complex surface has been prepared by covering a steel plate (SM400A) with a multilayered rubber material (Natural Rubber). The purpose of using this structure has been defined to get the comparable AE source location performance in a complicated signal propagation pathway. Both source location techniques have been conducted in a simulated AE wave propagating plane (300 mm * 200 mm in size) under Hsu-Nielsen method. Investigations reveal that the TOA technique gives several erroneous results along with good results. However, the DOAT method has produced all excellent results, even when using a complex surface. It was found since the TOA method is sensitive to constant velocity continuity, the present complex pathway leads to the velocity discontinuity, and thus, several incorrect results have been found. On the other hand, the DOAT method is dependent on the arrival time difference only, and therefore, it shows a higher performance in the source location, even in the presence of a complex structure.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.