Performance Evaluation of Various Open Flow SDN Controllers by Addressing Scalability Metric Based on Multifarious Topology Design on Software-defined Networks: A Comprehensive Survey

Abstract

AbstractThe Internet has reached a breaking point, enabling ubiquitous accessibility to all digital demands. Though people have accelerated their use of overall digital demands due to the convenience of the Internet, where nearly everything is connected and accessible, it is becoming increasingly difficult to manage and modify networks. It is always a challenge to meet the emerging needs of network industry. SDN framework was proposed to overcome traditional network architecture (TNA) restrictions in order to cope with contemporary network management in terms of flexibility, agility, responding to faults, and dynamic changes. SDN assists network operators by uncoupling the control plane from its underlying ternary content-addressable memory (TCAM) hardware often called as forwarding plane by allowing the networks to programme as per the anticipated network functionality. Now, switching from traditional to software-defined networking styles, it is worth to check the robustness of the open flow (south bound interface)-based controller platform and the capability of its fault tolerance attribute to approach the successful SDN implementation. The performance of SDN open flow controllers plays a vital role in SDN implementation, which is meant for the separation between control and data plane to leverage the life of network industry. This paper comprehensively surveys the contrast between traditional network architecture (TNA) and software-defined network architecture. This research work discusses about the best feasible SDN implementation, as well as the selection of a useful controller platform for overcoming traditional network constraints and the performance assessment criteria for SDN open flow controllers. Further, the survey is continued with possible literature or work done by various researchers on performance analysis and evaluation of open flow-based SDN controllers as well as in a group of two or more controllers with respect to multifarious network condition, network criteria/parameter/metric, scaling of network load resources with most important varying network topology design. Ultimately, it strives to point ongoing research omission with respect to controller’s performance bottleneck benchmark suggesting optimized solution when it is well experimented.KeywordsTraditional network architecture (TNA)Software-defined networking (SDN)SDN open flow controllersOpen flow protocolPerformance evaluation/analysis