Performance evaluation of a shallow prototype versus a standard depth traditional design drifting fish-aggregating device in the equatorial eastern Pacific tuna purse-seine fishery

Abstract

An at-sea experiment was undertaken to evaluate the performance of 150 shallow depth (5 m) prototype drifting fish-aggregating devices (DFADs) with rope appendages, compared to 150 standard depth (∼ 40 m) traditional design DFADs with purse-seine net appendages, in the equatorial eastern Pacific Ocean tuna purse-seine fishery, seeking a solution to reduce purse-seine fishing mortality on undesirable sizes of bigeye tuna. Following concurrent deployments of the two DFAD types along transects, the average daily drift speeds were significantly different but similar as were the drift trajectories among the two DFAD types. Based on evaluations of the time-series of acoustic data from the echo-sounder buoys attached to the shallow and standard depth DFADs, the average time before aggregation by non-tuna species was 15.3 d (range: 3.2–65.5) and 18.2 d (range: 1.1–101.2), respectively, and the average time before aggregation by tuna species was 62.2 d (range: 3.3–248.3) and 70.2 d (range: 1.5–270.5), respectively. Analyses of the catch per set data for tunas and non-tuna species, using generalized additive mixed models with Bayesian inference, indicated no significant differences in catch rates from sets on shallow and standard depth DFADs. There was a similar proportion of bigeye tuna in the catch for purse-seine sets on the shallow and standard depth DFADs.