Abstract

Floating objects drifting in the surface of tropical waters, also known as drifting fish aggregating devices (DFADs), attract hundreds of marine species, including tuna and non-tuna species. Industrial tropical purse seiners have been increasingly deploying artificial man-made DFADs equipped with satellite linked echo-sounder buoys, which provide fishers with information on the accurate geo-location of the object and rough estimates of the biomass aggregated underneath, to facilitate the catch of tuna. Although several hypotheses are under consideration to explain the aggregation and retention processes of pelagic species around DFADs, the reasons driving this associative behavior are uncertain. This study uses information from 962 echo-sounder buoys attached to virgin (i.e. newly deployed) DFADs deployed in the Western Indian Ocean between 2012 and 2015 by the Spanish fleet (42,322 days observations) to determine the first detection day of tuna and non-tuna species at DFAD and to model the aggregation processes of both species group using Generalize Additive Mixed Models. Moreover, different seasons, areas and depths of the DFAD underwater structure were considered in the analysis to account for potential spatio-temporal and structure differences. Results show that tuna species arrive at DFADs before non-tuna species (13.5±8.4 and 21.7±15.1 days, respectively), and provide evidence of the significant relationship between DFAD depth and detection time for tuna, suggesting faster tuna colonization in deeper objects. For non-tuna species, this relationship appeared to be not significant. The study also reveals both seasonal and spatial differences in the aggregation patterns for different species groups, suggesting that tuna and non-tuna species may have different aggregative behaviors depending on the spatio-temporal dynamic of DFADs. This work will contribute to the understanding of the fine and mesoscale ecology and behavior of target and non-target species around DFADs and will assist managers on the sustainability of exploited resources, helping to design spatio-temporal conservation management measures for tuna and non-tuna species.

Highlights

  • Floating objects in the surface of the tropical and subtropical oceans, known as drifting fish aggregating devices (DFADs), tend to aggregate pelagic species underneath, including main commercial tropical tuna species and non-target species [1]

  • This study aims to investigate the aggregation process of virgin DFADs in the Western Indian Ocean using the biomass acoustic records provided by fishers’ echo-sounder buoys

  • Tuna seemed to arrive at DFADs in 13.5±8.4 days whereas non-tuna species presence was recorded in 21.7±15.1 days, being differences significant between them (Mann-Whitney U test, U = 213980, N1 = 962, N2 = 962, P < 0.001) (Fig 3, Table 1)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Floating objects in the surface of the tropical and subtropical oceans, known as drifting fish aggregating devices (DFADs), tend to aggregate pelagic species underneath, including main commercial tropical tuna species (i.e. skipjack Katsuwonus pelamis, yellowfin Thunnus albacares, and bigeye Thunnus obesus) and non-target species (e.g. rainbow runner Elagatis bipinnulata, silky shark Carcharhinus falciformis, dolphinfish Coryphaena hippurus, sailfish Istiophorus platypterus, green turtle Chelonia mydas) [1]. The length of the underwater structure, which is ocean and fleet-specific, is used to reduce the drifting speed of the FAD [2] and is thought to act as a shelter for some of the associated non-tuna species [3,4,5] The reasons driving this associative behavior are not fully understood, several hypotheses are under consideration to explain the aggregation and retention processes of pelagic species around floating objects. The first is based on the assumption that tuna may use floating objects as a result of an evolutionary process, since natural objects could historically be accumulated in rich waters and frontal zones and be indicators of productive areas The latter relies on the social behavior of tuna and suggests that floating objects could act as meeting points, to form and re-structure schools of tuna in an otherwise visually-void environment

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call