Abstract

The output of a photovoltaic array is reduced considerably when PV panels are shaded even partially. The impact of shading causes an appreciable loss in power delivery, since the PV panels are connected in series and parallel to contribute to the required voltage and power for the load. The prevailing research on mitigating the shading impact is mostly based on complex reconfiguration strategies where the PV panels are subjected to complex rewiring schemes. On the other hand, to disperse the shading many studies in the literature defend the physical rearrangement of the panels. The available intensive reconfiguration schemes, such as the series parallel (SP), bridge link (BL), honeycomb (HC), and total cross tied (TCT) schemes, try only to mitigate the shading impact and there is no scope for compensation; as a result, a loss of output power is inevitable. In the proposed research work, both the mitigation of and the compensation for the losses incurred due to shading are studied. In this work, an optimal reconfiguration scheme is adopted to reduce the shading impact and a power electronic circuit with a battery source is designed to compensate for the shading losses in all aspects. In the optimal reconfiguration scheme, a bifurcation strategy is adopted in each column and the electrical connections of the PV panels are interchanged such that the shading impact is dispersed. The power electronic circuit consists of a half-bridge buck converter with a battery source that injects the current required by a shaded column. This setup compensates for the shaded PV array’s power and improves the efficiency of the total system. The proposed scheme was implemented in a 3200 W system and subjected to various shading patterns, including single panel shading, corner shading, long and wide shading, and random shading. The proposed scheme was simulated in the MATLAB Simulink environment and compared with static 4 × 4 PV array configurations, including the series parallel (SP), bridge link (BL), honeycomb (HC), and total cross tied (TCT) configurations. The comparative performance was assessed in terms of mismatch power loss, fill factor, and efficiency. The proposed system is suitable for all shading patterns and was proved to be very efficient even in the worst shading, where 1353 W was saved.

Highlights

  • The solar photovoltaic (PV) system is a prominent power source among all the renewable energy sources available due to its unique features of being scalable and portable

  • The proposed HBCI scheme was compared with existing array configurations, including series parallel (SP), total cross tied (TCT), bridge link (BL), and HC, and the effectiveness of HBCI was proved

  • It is evident that the HBCI reconfiguration scheme improves the power output by 57.3%, 57.9%, 57.3%, and 59.2%, reduces the power losses by 40.93%, 41.37%, 40.94%, and 42.30%, improves the fill factor by 37.16%, 37.63%, 37.17%, and 38.61%, and improves the efficiency by 5.81%, 5.87%, 5.81%, and 6.00% compared with the SP, BL, HC, and TCT array configurations, respectively

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The solar photovoltaic (PV) system is a prominent power source among all the renewable energy sources available due to its unique features of being scalable and portable. Research on dispersing the shading impact through reconfiguring the PV panels seems to be the pragmatic solution to mitigate the shading impact and to render a P-V curve without multiple power peaks [16]. Most research papers that defend the TCT scheme claim that it is a preferable method, but it currently cannot be used for PV arrays with complex shading [22]. This research work proposes and develops two solutions for mismatch and shading losses in a SP-connected PV array. Winston et al [25] proposed a current compensation scheme, but it requires the employment of the TCT and BL configurations, which in turn increases the system’s complexity. The impact of partial shading and the details of the proposed reconfiguration and current injection schemes are presented in Sections 2 and 3, respectively.

PV Model and Impact of Partial Shading
PV Model
Partial Shading and Its Effects
Optimal Reconfiguration and Proposed Half-Bridge Current Injection Scheme
Optimal Reconfiguration
Implementation of the HBCI Scheme
Results and Discussions
Case 1
Case 2
Case 3
Case 4
Comparison of the Cases
Cost–Benefit Analysis
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call