Abstract

Local and perhaps regional vernacular reinforced concrete building construction leans heavily against designing slabs with imbedded hidden beams for flooring systems in most structures including major edifices. The practice is distinctive in both framed and in shear wall structures. Hidden beams are favoured structural elements due to their many inherent features that characterize them; they save on floor height clearance; they also save on formwork, labour and material cost. Moreover, hidden beams form an acceptable aesthetic appearance that does not hinder efficient interior space partitioning. Such beams have the added advantage of clearing the way for horizontal electromechanical ductwork. However, seismic considerations, in all likelihood, are seldom seriously addressed. The mentioned structural system of shallow beams is adopted in ribbed slabs, waffle slabs and at times with solid slabs. Ribbed slabs and waffle slabs are more prone to hidden beam inclusion due to the added effective height of the concrete section. Due to the presence of a relatively high reinforcement ratio at the joints the sections at such location tend to become less ductile with unreliable contribution to spandrel force resistance. In the following study the structural influence of hidden beams within slabs is investigated. With the primary focus on a performance based analysis of such elements within a structure. This is investigated with due attention to shear wall contribution to the overall behaviour of such structures. Numerical results point in the direction that the function of hidden beams is not as adequate as desired. Therefore it is strongly believed that they are generally superfluous and maybe eliminated altogether. Conversely, shallow beams seem to render the overall seismic capacity of the structure unreliable. Since such an argument is rarely manifested within the linear analysis domain; a pushover analysis exercise is thus mandatory for behaviour prediction under strong seismic events. In such events drop beams have the edge.

Highlights

  • Hidden beams are quite popular and form an essential part of modern reinforced concrete framed structures

  • It is safe to presume that such beams have a high reinforcement ratio at the column connection in order to compensate for the insufficient effective depth; ductility is a diminished inherent feature

  • For the comparative study the building selected is analyzed as a bare frame structure with the inclusion of judiciously distributed shear walls and with drop beams replacing all shallow beams

Read more

Summary

Statement of the problem

Hidden beams are quite popular and form an essential part of modern reinforced concrete framed structures. It is safe to presume that such beams have a high reinforcement ratio at the column connection in order to compensate for the insufficient effective depth; ductility is a diminished inherent feature. This is an effective analysis tool that predicts post yield structural behaviour; identifies failure modes and the potential for progressive collapse. Towards such intention a framed structure is selected which is comprised of conventional column and slab sections. For the comparative study the building selected is analyzed as a bare frame structure with the inclusion of judiciously distributed shear walls and with drop beams replacing all shallow beams

The building numerical models
Findings
Cconclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.