Abstract
Abstract The efficiency of various stages of physical design in the Very Large Scale Integration (VLSI) circuit can be enhanced by using multi-objective optimization techniques. The circuit is partitioned into a set of modules at the beginning of the physical design phase. This step is known as circuit partitioning. All subsequent physical design stages, like floor planning, placement, pin configuration, and routing etc, are influenced by the outcome of the circuit partitioning method being used. The efficiency of the partitioning method controls the quality of ultimate architecture. The efficiency achieved by the final product may be decreased by incorrect partitioning. This study compares the effectiveness of four Meta-heuristic optimization methods include the Genetic Algorithm (GA), Satin Bowered Bird (SBO), Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO), Simulated Annealing (SA) — in terms of number of net cut, duration of sleeping mode, and efficiency in power consumption for addressing the VLSI circuit partitioning problem. This experiment achieves K-way partitioning of the circuit that minimizes net cuts as well as maximizes sleep duration simultaneously, by evaluating optimization function. Solutions developed using GA, SBO and PSO consistently surpass those acquired using SA with respect to quality of optimal solution. The average optimum net cut and sleep duration achieved by this experiment are 10.7 and 9.9 in GA ; 11.5 and 12.3 in SBO, 11.80 and 9.10 in PSO; and 16.8 and 6.7 in SA based method respectively. This research resulted in a considerable reduction in power consumption, with the system’s average power efficiency achieved by 21.6%, 26.84%, 19.85%, and 14.62%, respectively, in GA, SBO , PSO, and SA based optimizations. The experimental results are compared with a recent publication and proposed GA, SBO, and PSO based methods achieve 18.75%, 4.17%, and 1.04% improvement in terms of average net cut respectively. The proposed GA, SBO, PSO and SA based methods also achieve 44.90%, 51.30%, 40.05%, and 18.60% improvement in terms of average power efficiency.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.