Perfluorooctanoic Acid (in the Presence of Fetal Bovine Serum) Induces Proliferation in ERα Positive and ERα Negative Breast Cancer Cell Lines

Abstract

Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) is a synthetic chemical belonging to a larger group of fluorotelomers. These compounds have been used in the production of both industrial and consumer products as surfactants and due to their chemical nature are environmentally persistent pollutants. Individuals can be exposed to PFOA through ingesting PFOA‐contaminated water or food. PFOA has been shown to have a half‐life of approximately 4 years in humans. While the long‐term effects of PFOA are largely unknown, there is increasing evidence suggesting it to be an endocrine disruptor. Studies have shown that PFOA binds to and activates peroxisome‐proliferator‐activated receptor α (PPARα), which can regulate the expression of other genes and receptors such as the other PPAR isoforms as well as estrogen receptor α (ERα).Previous experiments in our lab demonstrated that PFOA treatment of MCF‐7 breast cancer cells (an ERα positive cell line) decreased expression of ERα mRNA and protein, and decreased cell viability by ~20% within 48h of treatment compared to DMSO controls. However, these cells were treated in the absence of fetal bovine serum (FBS). When we repeated these experiments without serum withdrawal, we initially noted a tendency towards increased proliferation in MCF‐7 cells treated with 50μM and 100μM PFOA at both 24h and 48h compared to control. To further examine the role of ERα in this PFOA‐induced proliferation, we carried out additional experiments in MCF‐7 cells along with experiments in another ERα‐positive cell line, T47D, as well as an ERα‐negative cell line, MDA‐MB‐231. There was a tendency for increased viability in all three cell lines when treated with PFOA, although only the MDA‐MB‐231 cells and the T47D cells showed a statistically significant (~20%) increase at 48h with 50μM PFOA and 100μM PFOA, respectively. These data suggest that the PFOA‐induced increase in cell viability in these cell lines is not dependent on ERα expression. In addition, the opposing effects of PFOA on proliferation in MCF‐7 cells in the presence and absence of FBS demonstrates the importance of accurately and completely reporting cell culture and treatment conditions.Support or Funding InformationAugusta University Department of Biological Sciences, Augusta University Center for Undergraduate Research and Scholarship