Abstract

A number of recent studies have explored “perceptual learning,” in which listeners use lexical knowledge to learn about a talker’s idiosyncratic phoneme pronunciations and adjust their perception of other tokens from that talker accordingly. In a typical perceptual learning study, listeners might hear an item that is ambiguous between “crocotile” and “crocodile” during exposure. Since only crocodile is a word, listeners would learn (following several examples) that this talker has long VOTs, and subsequently at test show a shift in their categorization of a /d/‐/t/ VOT continuum by the same talker. The present study explored perceptual learning through cues rather than through lexical knowledge. We used a phonetic contrast (s‐th) in which there are both primary (spectral) and secondary (amplitude/duration) cues to phonetic identity. Listeners heard tokens of minimal s‐th word pairs in which either the primary or secondary cue was ambiguous, but the alternative cue was unambiguous and thus disambiguated th...

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.