Abstract
ABSTRACT Do-not-resuscitate (DNR) orders have differing meanings for persons depending on their age, training, and personal beliefs. In this paper we explore these meanings as expressed in the attitudes about do-not-resuscitate orders of three groups: university students in a health-related discipline of social work, university students in a non-health related discipline, and persons over the age of sixty. Findings from analysis of the three groups suggest a strong interest in issues surrounding resuscitation. Social and nonmedical factors are important in the decision to resuscitate and therefore should be given careful consideration. Next to their spouse, respondents named their physician as the person they most wanted to talk with about withholding resuscitation. Yet, studies of physicians cited earlier indicate many physicians are hesitant to discuss end of life decisions with their patients. With the added help and support of the family, concerned friends, and social workers, individuals can make the best possible DNR decision and avoid unnecessary pain and suffering.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
