Perbedaan Persalinan Sectio Caesaria Metode Eracs Dan Non Eracs Terhadap Penyembuhan Luka Pada Ibu Nifas Di Rumah Sakit Dr. Hafiz Cianjur

Abstract

Introduction: The impact that often arises after Caesarean Section delivery includes infection of the operating wound due to the poor wound-healing process. The ERACS method of Caesarean Section delivery has caught the public's attention because it is claimed to reduce postoperative pain and allow the wound recovery process to proceed faster. Methods: This research method uses quantitative research with an analytical observational research type and a prospective cohort design. The population in this study was 630 Caesarean Section post-partum women on day 7 at Dr. Hafiz Hospital in Cianjur. Using the purposive sampling technique, a sample of 86 respondents was obtained. Results: The results of the data analysis using the T-test. From the data normality test using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test the data obtained a significant value of 0,000; so, it can be said that the data is normally distributed. The researcher then conducted a parametric independent sample test. According to statistical analysis with the T-Test test the sig value or p-value is 0,004; which means the p-value is <0,05. This means that there is a difference between the ERACS and non-ERACS methods of Caesarean Section delivery for wound healing. Discussion: The conclusion is that there is a difference in the wound healing process of Caesarean Section delivery patients with ERACS and non-ERACS methods. Suggestions for Caesarean Section delivery with the ERACS method can be applied to all Caesarean Section patients who have no complications with the ERACS method because the ERACS method can reduce complications in patient wound healing.