Abstract
The right of review is the right of the perpetrator, in contrast to ordinary legal remedies whose application is enshrined in Article 268 paragraph (3) of the Criminal Code. However, in SEMA Number 7 of 2014, a review can be submitted on the grounds that there is a conflict between the decisions. Through Decision 467 Pk/Pid.Sus/2021, the panel of judges decided that the application was unacceptable. From the description above, the author intends to analyze two main issues to be examined, namely whether the decision is in accordance with the Criminal Procedure Code, and whether the reason for the decision is not acceptable to the application. In this paper, the author conducts a descriptive analysis method. Based on the discussion presented in this paper, it is concluded that the decision is not in line with Article 79 of Law Number 14 of 1985 concerning the Supreme Court, using the reason that there is no contradiction submitted as evidences as required in SEMA Number 7 of 2014
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
