Abstract
The purpose of this research is to estimate the impact of direct cash assistance (BLT), rice for the poor (Raskin), and LPG subsidies on the number of poor families from 2008 to 2020 using multiple linear analytic techniques and secondary data. The results of the study conclude that what is proven to reduce the number of poor households is BLT, because the cash form of the poor can be used to improve their standard of living such as business capital, while the other two variables, namely Raskin and LPG subsidies, actually increase the number of poor households in the form of basic commodities to support daily life - days so there is minimal opportunity to improve the standard of living.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: e-Jurnal Perspektif Ekonomi dan Pembangunan Daerah
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
