Abstract
This research aims to analyze the application of the rule of reason approach in the abuse of a dominant position and the authority of the KPPU in applying the rule of reason in the abuse of a dominant position. The method used is normative juridical research. The results of this research show that the KPPU in assessing Article 25 of Law No. 5 of 1999 alternatively uses one of the two per se illegal or rule of reason approaches with the aim of efficiency, innovation and consumer welfare
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Jurnal Hukum to-ra : Hukum Untuk Mengatur dan Melindungi Masyarakat
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
