Peer review declaration

Abstract

The review processes in the 6th ICSBE 2021 were conducted using own system named conference management system (CMC), which was done by expert referees from the professional (national and international referees) and close scientific background. All the accepted papers passed two round review processed by two different reviewers, where each of them did not know. Followings are detail peer review information.• Type of peer review: Double-blind Peer review was conducted by double blind type with both of author and reviewers do not each other. And, in the paper, the author did not write the name and affiliation in the review processes. Review processes were done by two round reviews: 1st round: review and comments by two reviewers, and 2nd round: reviewers checked any revision from author based on the comments.• Conference submission management system:The 6th ICSBE used conference management system (CMC) to deal various tasks including submitting your paper, receiving the results of paper review, submitting the final (camera-ready) version of your paper, registering as participant (as a presenter or an observer) in the Conference, receiving invoice to be paid prior to the Conference, uploading your proof of payment and receiving the receipt of your payment, receiving unique QR-code for on-site registration, receiving certificate of participation in an electronic form. Following is the link of CMC system: https://icsbe.tsipil-uii.ac.id/otentifikasi/• Number of submissions received: We received 81 papers• Number of submissions sent for review: Number paper for review is 76 papers• Number of submissions accepted: Number paper accepted is 50 papers.• Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): Acceptance rate is 66%.• Average number of reviews per paper: Each paper was two round reviews.• Total number of reviewers involved:Total number reviewers involved were 44 people including national and international reviewers.• Any additional info on review process:In the review process, the authors have to provide the revision report using revision report template. The paper rejection will be taken in following conditions: 1) Not using English, 2) revision is not performed based on reviewer comments, 3) not fit the IOP template, 4) papers double submitted, and 5) return revision paper out of deadline.• Contact person for queries:Name : Dewi Wulandari, S.Hut., M.Agr., Ph.DAffiliation : Universitas Islam IndonesiaEmail : dewi.wulandari@uii.ac.id