Peer review declaration

Abstract

All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing.• Type of peer review: Other An open way of reviewing was used: two reviewers - min requirements - PhD specialists on the topic of the report.• Conference submission management system: The conference was managed by an international organizing committee, the composition of which is given in the appendix. Conference materials (program, abstracts) were presented in hard copy: program brochure, book of abstracts, and in electronic form (*.pdf format) on the conference website https://itad.com.ua/. Additional information about the conference was presented on the website of the Kharkiv National University of Civil Engineering and Architecture http://kstuca.kharkov.ua/nauka/konferencii-ta-seminari.• Number of submissions received: 129• Number of submissions sent for review: 129• Number of submissions accepted: 123• Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 95.3• Average number of reviews per paper: 2• Total number of reviewers involved:67• Any additional info on review process: The review process was carried out in accordance with the instructions for the reviewer: REMINDER TO REVIEWER BASIC REQUIREMENTS FOR REVIEW Technical criteria• Scientific novelty: especially scientific rigor, precision and correctness.• Clarity of expression; exchange of ideas; readability and discussion of concepts.• Sufficient discussion of the context of the work and appropriate references.Quality criteria• Originality: is the work relevant and new?• Motivation: Does the problem under consideration have valid motivation? All documents must clearly demonstrate scientific interest in the results.• Repetition: Has a significant portion of the manuscript already been published?• Duration: is the content of the work of sufficient scientific interest?Presentation criteria• Title: Is it adequate and appropriate for the content of the article?• : Does it contain basic information about the article? Is it complete? Is it suitable for inclusion in an abstraction service?• Diagrams, figures, tables and captions: are they important and understandable?• Text and math: are they concise and easy to understand? If you recommend shortening, please suggest what to skip.• Conclusion: Does the article contain a carefully written conclusion summarizing what was learned and why it is interesting and useful?• Contact person for queries: prof. Viktor Sopov E-mail: vpsopov@gmail.com APPENDIX ORGANIZING COMMITTEE OF CONFERENCE List of Chairman of the organizing committee, Co-chairs of the organizing committee and Members of the organizing committee are avaliable in this pdf.