Abstract
Simple SummaryBifocal suprasellar germ cell tumors are a unique type of an uncommon brain tumor in children. Compared to other germ cell tumors in the brain, bifocal tumors are poorly understood and have a bad prognosis. In this paper we explore features that predict which children will have good outcomes and which will not. This is important for the research community because it can help physicians decide what type of radiation treatment is best to treat these children. Our study shows that bifocal tumors have a unique appearance on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) compared to other germ cell tumors. Children with bifocal tumors are more likely to be male, have tumors that come back sooner, and cause death sooner. We found that children with bifocal tumors likely need a wider radiation field, especially if they have a high-risk tumor type, high-risk appearance on MRI, or tumors spread throughout the nervous system.Suprasellar germ cell tumors (S-GCTs) are rare, presenting in either solitary or multifocal fashion. In this study, we retrospectively examine 22 solitary S-GCTs and 20 bifocal germ cell tumors (GCTs) over a 30-year period and demonstrate clinical, radiographic, and prognostic differences between the two groups with therapeutic implications. Compared to S-GCTs, bifocal tumors were almost exclusively male, exhibited higher rate of metastasis, and had worse rates of progression free and overall survival trending toward significance. We also introduce a novel magnetic resonance (MR) imaging classification of suprasellar GCT into five types: a IIIrd ventricle floor tumor extending dorsally with or without an identifiable pituitary stalk (Type Ia, Ib), ventrally (Type III), in both directions (Type II), small lesions at the IIIrd ventricle floor extending to the stalk (Type IV), and tumor localized in the stalk (Type V). S-GCTs almost uniformly presented as Type I–III, while most bifocal GCTs were Type IV with a larger pineal mass. These differences are significant as bifocal GCTs representing concurrent primaries or subependymal extension may be treated with whole ventricle radiation, while cerebrospinal fluid (CSF)-borne metastases warrant craniospinal irradiation (CSI). Although further study is necessary, we recommend CSI for bifocal GCTs exhibiting high-risk features such as metastasis or non-germinomatous germ cell tumor histology.
Highlights
Intracranial germ cell tumors (GCTs) are an uncommon malignancy that represent approximately0.9% of all pediatric tumors, 3.7% of pediatric brain tumors, and 28.7% of germ cell tumors overall [1,2].GCT presentation is very heterogenous, without uniform imaging classification
We explore a large cohort of patients with solitary suprasellar (S-GCT) and bifocal
There is a striking difference in sexual distributions between solitary S-GCTs, which demonstrated a female predominance, and the other groups, which were almost exclusively male
Summary
Intracranial germ cell tumors (GCTs) are an uncommon malignancy that represent approximately0.9% of all pediatric tumors, 3.7% of pediatric brain tumors, and 28.7% of germ cell tumors overall [1,2].GCT presentation is very heterogenous, without uniform imaging classification. Intracranial germ cell tumors (GCTs) are an uncommon malignancy that represent approximately. GCTs occur most often in the pineal (P-GCT) and suprasellar (S-GCT) locations, followed by the basal ganglia (BG-GCT) and rarely at other central nervous system (CNS) sites. GCTs can arise concurrently in the suprasellar and pineal regions, a distinct pathologic entity described as “bifocal” GCTs [3,4,5,6]. Bifocal tumors are especially poorly understood, with few studies analyzing their natural history or comparing outcomes versus solitary GCTs. Bifocal tumors are especially poorly understood, with few studies analyzing their natural history or comparing outcomes versus solitary GCTs It is further unclear whether bifocal GCTs represent independent primaries or metastases, with the difference significant for treatment. Independent primaries, for example, are suitable for limited radiation fields, while and metastases warrant full craniospinal irradiation
Published Version (Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have