Peculiarities of application of judicial control in the activities of the public administration

Abstract

The article identifies the legal features of the application of judicial control to improve the efficiency of public administration. It was found that the content of judicial control is: the court’s assessment of the legality of the actions of public administration bodies and their officials; legality of adopted regulations and decisions; in exposing violations or restrictions of the rights of individuals and legal entities (subjects of legal relations arising in the field of public administration); in identifying the causes of such violations and taking the necessary measures to prevent them in the future; in taking measures to restore violated rights due to the need to bring to justice those who violated the law.
 Judicial control over the activities of public administration is a special type of activity of courts of different jurisdictions, which consists in direct (indirect) and indirect (indirect) verification of the legality and legality of decisions, actions or omissions of a certain subject of power and public administration. constitutes the essence of the
 case or accompanies the consideration and resolution of individual legal disputes. The result can be the restoration of the violated rule of law, certain rights, protection of public relations and restoration of the fully violated rights of various legal entities arising in the state, through special enforcement bodies or voluntarily.
 According to the type of judicial jurisdiction, the following types of judicial control in the activities of public administration can be distinguished: a) general judicial control, or control by general courts during the consideration of administrative, civil and criminal cases; b) specialized judicial control, or control by specialized (administrative, commercial) courts; c) constitutional judicial control, or control by the Constitutional Court of Ukraine.