Abstract

Morbidity and mortality conferences (M + M) are used for the discussion of errors and thereby further education in surgery. However, it is not clear whether this kind of quality assurance has any influence on the results of surgery. We investigated whether M + M as part of PDCA-cylce (plan, do, check, act) with prospectively collected quality data, fixing future goals using benchmarking data and defining a strategy to reach these goals can lead to an increase in quality. Using surveillance data n = 673 colorectal resections were analysed. Between 2003 and 2008 we found a wound infection rate of 5.6 %. Comparing 2003-2005 (period of strategy development using M + M) and 2006-2008 (period of strategy conversion) the frequency decreased from 7.8 % to 3.5 % (p = 0.012). Thereby the risk factors for wound infection (ASA, wound classification, duration of surgery and wound infection score) were not different. M + M as part of this PDCA cycle resulted in a clear increase in surgical quality.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.