PD17-06 WILMS TUMOR: INSIGHTS INTO THE ROLE OF INTEGRINS DRIVING CANCER STEM CELLS SELF-RENEWAL VS. DIFFERENTIATION

Abstract

You have accessJournal of UrologyCME1 Apr 2023PD17-06 WILMS TUMOR: INSIGHTS INTO THE ROLE OF INTEGRINS DRIVING CANCER STEM CELLS SELF-RENEWAL VS. DIFFERENTIATION Astgik Petrosyan, Valentina Villani, Paola Aguiari, Min Madhi, Roger De Filippo, Gregory Shackleford, Anat Erdreich-Epstein, Stefano Da Sacco, and Laura Perin Astgik PetrosyanAstgik Petrosyan More articles by this author , Valentina VillaniValentina Villani More articles by this author , Paola AguiariPaola Aguiari More articles by this author , Min MadhiMin Madhi More articles by this author , Roger De FilippoRoger De Filippo More articles by this author , Gregory ShacklefordGregory Shackleford More articles by this author , Anat Erdreich-EpsteinAnat Erdreich-Epstein More articles by this author , Stefano Da SaccoStefano Da Sacco More articles by this author , and Laura PerinLaura Perin More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000003272.06AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Wilms Tumor (WT) is the most common pediatric renal cancer. Growing evidence links WT to aberrant nephrogenesis. While studies highlighted the genetic complexity of WT, little is known about the molecular mechanisms that regulate WT development. Here we report that uncommitted nephrogenic progenitors (NPs) expressing SIX2 and CITED1 (the master regulators of renal development) present characteristics of cancer stem cells (CSCs) and are the ones driving WT. We have also studied the role of integrins in these NPs in regulating WT development. METHODS: WT and human fetal kidney (hFK) samples were histologically analyzed, digested to single-cell suspension, incubated with Smartflare-probe to isolate SIX2+CITED1+ cells, and processed for RNA-seq, single-cell RNA-seq and spatial transcriptomics. Xenografts of WT-NPs and hFK-NPs were generated and tumor formation was assessed. Analyses of mechanisms that regulate self-renewal vs. differentiation were performed in vitro and in vivo. Knockdown with miREs against SIX2 and CITED1 was performed on WT-NPs and processed for RNA-seq. RESULTS: By comparing NPs from different WT subtypes and NPs from hFK we identified that cells expressing SIX2 and CITED1 fulfill CSC criteria, reliably recapitulating WT in transplantation studies. We showed that self-renewal vs. differentiation of SIX2+CITED1+ WT CSCs is regulated by the interplay between integrins ITGB1 and ITGB4. WT transplantation studies show that blocking ITGB1 or ITGB4 leads to higher number of SIX2+CITED1+ cells in the xenografts. Knockdown of SIX2 and CITED1 increased expression of kidney differentiation markers LHX1, WNT7B, PODXL, MECOM, reduced expression of nephrogenic markers MEOX1, TMEM100, EYA1, MAYFB, and increased expression of ITGB1, ITGB4, and LAMA5. CONCLUSIONS: These studies define SIX2+CITED1+ cells as the nephrogenic CSCs of WT, where ITGB1 and ITGB4 interplay may play a role in self-renewal vs. differentiation and serve as a potential target for new strategies to treat WT. Source of Funding: GOFARR Fund © 2023 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 209Issue Supplement 4April 2023Page: e497 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2023 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Astgik Petrosyan More articles by this author Valentina Villani More articles by this author Paola Aguiari More articles by this author Min Madhi More articles by this author Roger De Filippo More articles by this author Gregory Shackleford More articles by this author Anat Erdreich-Epstein More articles by this author Stefano Da Sacco More articles by this author Laura Perin More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...