Abstract
e20577 Background: Chemotherapies combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and/or bevacizumab (named IC, BC and IBC respectively) are the preferred first-line options for PD-L1 negative and oncogenic driver wild-type metastatic lung adenocarcinoma. However, the optimal strategy is still undetermined. Methods: This retrospective real-world study enrolled PD-L1 negative metastatic lung adenocarcinoma patients from four cancer centers between January 1, 2018 and June 30, 2022. All the patients received IC, BC, or IBC as the first-line therapies. The efficacy and safety were evaluated. Results: A total of 205 patients were included, with 60, 83, and 62 patients in IC, BC, and IBC groups, respectively. Patients receiving IBC obtained the highest objective response rate (ORR) (43.5%) and disease control rate (DCR) (100%) relative to those receiving IC (40.4%, 84.2%) or BC (40.5%, 96.2%). Compared with the IC (6.74m) or BC (8.28m) group, IBC group improved significantly median progression-free survival (mPFS) (9.53m, P = 0.005). However, the difference in overall survival (OS) were not observed among the three groups. When analyzed based on different clinical and molecular information, we found that male gender, ever smoking, wild-type genes, and adrenal metastasis predicts superior PFS benefit when treated with IBC. In patients with liver metastasis, IBC or BC treatment achieved better PFS compared with IC. No additional adverse reactions were observed in IBC group compared with other two groups. Conclusions: Combined IBC treatment achieved superior DCR and PFS compared with IC or BC treatment in patients with PD-L1 negative metastatic lung adenocarcinoma, while did not increase the adverse events.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call