Abstract

Problem Statement : The Internet as a tool that presents many challenges has drawn the attention of researchers in the field of education and especially foreign language teaching. However, there has been a lack of information about the true nature of these environments. In recent years, determination of the patterns of negotiation of meaning as a way to delve in these environments has grown in popularity. Purpose of the Study: The current study was an effort to determine the types and frequencies of negotiation of meaning in the interaction of Malaysian students as English as a second language learners and, furthermore, to compare findings of this study with correspondent previous studies. To this end, two research questions were posed for this study: (a) what types of negotiation of meaning emerge in text-based synchronous CMC environments? and (b) Are there any differences between findings of this study and previous studies in terms of negotiation of meaning functions in this environment? Method: Participants of this study were fourteen English as second language learners at Universiti Putra Malaysia (UPM). They were involved in a series of discussions over selected short stories. Analysis of students’ chat logs was carried out through computer - mediated discourse analysis (CMDA). Findings and Results: This study yielded 10 types of functions in negotiation of meaning, which are clarification request, confirmation, confirmation check, correction or self correction, elaboration, elaboration request, reply clarification or definition, reply confirmation, reply elaboration, and vocabulary check. Furthermore, findings of this study indicated that students negotiated with an average of 2.10 per 100 words. According to the findings of this study, the most - frequently used functions were confirmation, elaboration, and elaboration request and the least frequently used functions were vocabulary check, reply confirmation, and reply clarification. The findings of this study were in line with the findings of previous studies in that the proficiency of the participants influences the amount of negotiation for meaning strategies that occur. Conclusions and Recommendations: Findings of this study will give insight to teachers, learners, and researchers in the field of SLA and will help to sustain their liveliness and curiosity. Taking into account the current situation of Malaysia as the country that host so many international students from all over the world, future studies of these kinds can focus on examining the factor of proficiency in different dyads and its effect on students’ interactions in terms of negotiation of meaning. Keywords: Computer – mediated communication (CMC); computer –mediated discourse analysis (CMDA); negotiation of meaning, teaching English as a Second Language; Language learning

Highlights

  • A decade after the advent of high-speed network connections, connection among people all over the world has become very easy through computers and other mobile technologies

  • Taking into account the current situation of Malaysia as the country that host so many international students from all over the world, future studies of these kinds can focus on examining the factor of proficiency in different dyads and its effect on students’ interactions in terms of negotiation of meaning

  • The highest level of interactivity is characterized by different mediums of CMC which includes E- mail and on - line chat

Read more

Summary

Introduction

A decade after the advent of high-speed network connections, connection among people all over the world has become very easy through computers and other mobile technologies. Advances in information and computer technologies (ICTs) have sparked new initiatives in integrating these advances into language learning and teaching. The form of this use is still getting more advance and more complicated in a way that it has become an inseparable part of people’s lives. CMC is defined by Romiszowski and Mason (2004) as “the process by which people create, exchange, and perceive information using networked telecommunication systems that facilitate encoding, transmitting, and decoding messages”(p.389). Akayoglu and Altun (2009 ) define CMC as “any form of communication between two or more individuals who interact and/or influence each other via separate computers through the internet or a network connection, using social software” In the process of interaction as problems in communication arise, the learners modify their speech linguistically in an effort toward making it comprehensible

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call