Abstract

Neural substrates underlying the human-pet relationship are largely unknown. We examined fMRI brain activation patterns as mothers viewed images of their own child and dog and an unfamiliar child and dog. There was a common network of brain regions involved in emotion, reward, affiliation, visual processing and social cognition when mothers viewed images of both their child and dog. Viewing images of their child resulted in brain activity in the midbrain (ventral tegmental area/substantia nigra involved in reward/affiliation), while a more posterior cortical brain activation pattern involving fusiform gyrus (visual processing of faces and social cognition) characterized a mother's response to her dog. Mothers also rated images of their child and dog as eliciting similar levels of excitement (arousal) and pleasantness (valence), although the difference in the own vs. unfamiliar child comparison was larger than the own vs. unfamiliar dog comparison for arousal. Valence ratings of their dog were also positively correlated with ratings of the attachment to their dog. Although there are similarities in the perceived emotional experience and brain function associated with the mother-child and mother-dog bond, there are also key differences that may reflect variance in the evolutionary course and function of these relationships.

Highlights

  • Humans began domesticating dogs to serve in a variety of roles, including as human companions or ‘pets’, 18,000–32,000 years ago [1]

  • Emotion Semantic Face Sensory/Image N/A Reward Reward Emotion Motor/Sensory Motor aNeurosynth term/function; N/A = not available in the Neurosynth atlas. bHemisphere: R, right, L, left cCluster size; number of contiguous voxels with p, 0.01. dx, y, and z coordinates in Montreal Neurological Institute (MNI) space. eFamilywise error corrected at the cluster level

  • Unfamiliar) in brain regions involved in emotion, reward, and affiliative processes, salience/interoception, and in associated structures, including those involved in visual processing and social cognition with greater brain activation for own than other child and dog (Table 2)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Humans began domesticating dogs to serve in a variety of roles, including as human companions or ‘pets’, 18,000–32,000 years ago [1]. The practice of adopting and nurturing other species (like dogs) or ‘‘alloparenting’’ is a common human behavior across different cultures that arose from the evolutionary need for domestication [2]. 2/3 of U.S households have pets, and over $50 billion is spent annually on their care (http:// www.americanpetproducts.org/press_industrytrends.asp). Pet owners have been termed ‘pet parents’ in the popular media, and half of pet owners consider their pet as much a part of the family as any member of the household (AP-Petside.com Poll 2009). Pets can be beneficial to the physical, social, and emotional well-being of humans [3,4,5,6], and animal-assisted therapy is widely used as a complementary medicine and adjunctive mental health intervention [7,8]

Objectives
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call