Abstract

Male care for offspring is unexpected in polygynandrous mammals. Evidence from nonhuman primates, however, indicates not only the existence of stable male–immature associations in multimale–multifemale groups, but also male care in the form of protection from infanticidal attacks and conspecific harassment. Here, we investigate the relationship characteristics, dynamics, and consequences of male–immature associations in wild Assamese macaques, Macaca assamensis, at Phu Khieo Wildlife Sanctuary, Thailand, to inform hypotheses of their evolutionary origins. Female Assamese macaques reproduce seasonally and do not signal ovulation, resulting in low mating and paternity skew. However, male–immature associations are predicted by paternity, and male behavior potentially reflects paternal effort. We present focal animal data on 12 immatures followed from birth beyond weaning into their juvenile life (1188 focal hours). The distribution of composite sociality indices suggests that male–immature relationships were highly differentiated. Association patterns and the degree of differentiation remained stable from 6 mo well into the juvenile phase, suggesting that male protection extends beyond the phase of high infanticide risk. Based on Hinde indices, immatures were responsible for maintaining the relationships. The likelihood that an infant was associated with its preferred male increased if the mother was absent and if other males were present in proximity, suggesting that immatures sought protection. The presence of the preferred male did not decrease the rate of mild aggression immatures received from group members, but the stronger the relationship between an immature and a male, the more often it received agonistic support from him. Future studies will have to assess whether this agonistic support translates into improved fitness and represents true paternal care.

Highlights

  • Most mammalian males do not provide care for infants and —if present at all after conception— associate and interact with immatures only rarely (van Schaik and Kappeler 1997)

  • We investigated the relationship between the strength of male–immature relationships based on the Composite Sociality Index (CSI) and the frequency of support the infant received from the male in conflicts with other group members

  • The CSI scores for one immature were all

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Most mammalian males do not provide care for infants and —if present at all after conception— associate and interact with immatures only rarely (van Schaik and Kappeler 1997). The paternal care hypothesis proposes that associations reflect care provided by the male for his current offspring, thereby increasing the offspring’s chances of survival and the provider’s fitness (Trivers 1972). Instead of directly caring for infants, e.g., carrying and food sharing, males may protect their offspring from conspecific threats to the physical integrity and survival of offspring (Buchan et al 2003; van Schaik and Paul 1996). High skew in mating and paternity success further increases the risk of infanticide (Henzi and Barrett 2003; Ostner et al 2013; Palombit 2000, 2003)

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call