Abstract
Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) with four-vessel fenestrated (fEVAR) or branched (bEVAR) endografts currently represents the forefront of minimally invasive complex aortic aneurysm repair. In the present study, we used patient-specific computational flow simulation (CFS) to assess the differences in postoperative hemodynamic effects associated with fEVAR vs bEVAR.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
