Patient and Observer Graded Rhinoplasty Scar Outcomes: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Fast Absorbing Versus Permanent Columellar Suture Closure.

Abstract

Background: When performing an open rhinoplasty, surgeons commonly use nonabsorbable skin sutures to close the columellar incision. These are believed to minimize scarring. However, removal can be associated with patient discomfort and outcomes may not be superior to using absorbable sutures. Objective: To compare difference in scar appearance for columellar closure after rhinoplasty with absorbable and nonabsorbable sutures. Methods: We performed a prospective randomized control trial with 61 patients. Forty-one patients completed follow-up and were included in final analysis: 23 whose columellar incision was closed with absorbable sutures and 18 with nonabsorbable sutures. A blinded surgeon performed Stony Brook Evaluation Scale (SBES) and a patient performed Patient Scar Assessment Questionnaire (PSAQ) was completed for each suture type. Results: Our results did not reject the null hypothesis that there is no difference in SBES or PSAQ scores between absorbable and nonabsorbable suture types. Conclusions: No difference was detected in scar outcomes between absorbable and nonabsorbable sutures for closure of the columellar incision created during an open rhinoplasty as rated by both patients and blinded clinicians.