Abstract
Rare germline genetic variants in several genes are associated with increased breast cancer (BC) risk, but their precise contributions to different disease subtypes are unclear. This information is relevant to guidelines for gene panel testing and risk prediction. To characterize tumors associated with BC susceptibility genes in large-scale population- or hospital-based studies. The multicenter, international case-control analysis of the BRIDGES study included 42 680 patients and 46 387 control participants, comprising women aged 18 to 79 years who were sampled independently of family history from 38 studies. Studies were conducted between 1991 and 2016. Sequencing and analysis took place between 2016 and 2021. Protein-truncating variants and likely pathogenic missense variants in ATM, BARD1, BRCA1, BRCA2, CHEK2, PALB2, RAD51C, RAD51D, and TP53. The intrinsic-like BC subtypes as defined by estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and ERBB2 (formerly known as HER2) status, and tumor grade; morphology; size; stage; lymph node involvement; subtype-specific odds ratios (ORs) for carrying protein-truncating variants and pathogenic missense variants in the 9 BC susceptibility genes. The mean (SD) ages at interview (control participants) and diagnosis (cases) were 55.1 (11.9) and 55.8 (10.6) years, respectively; all participants were of European or East Asian ethnicity. There was substantial heterogeneity in the distribution of intrinsic subtypes by gene. RAD51C, RAD51D, and BARD1 variants were associated mainly with triple-negative disease (OR, 6.19 [95% CI, 3.17-12.12]; OR, 6.19 [95% CI, 2.99-12.79]; and OR, 10.05 [95% CI, 5.27-19.19], respectively). CHEK2 variants were associated with all subtypes (with ORs ranging from 2.21-3.17) except for triple-negative disease. For ATM variants, the association was strongest for the hormone receptor (HR)+ERBB2- high-grade subtype (OR, 4.99; 95% CI, 3.68-6.76). BRCA1 was associated with increased risk of all subtypes, but the ORs varied widely, being highest for triple-negative disease (OR, 55.32; 95% CI, 40.51-75.55). BRCA2 and PALB2 variants were also associated with triple-negative disease. TP53 variants were most strongly associated with HR+ERBB2+ and HR-ERBB2+ subtypes. Tumors occurring in pathogenic variant carriers were of higher grade. For most genes and subtypes, a decline in ORs was observed with increasing age. Together, the 9 genes were associated with 27.3% of all triple-negative tumors in women 40 years or younger. The results of this case-control study suggest that variants in the 9 BC risk genes differ substantially in their associated pathology but are generally associated with triple-negative and/or high-grade disease. Knowing the age and tumor subtype distributions associated with individual BC genes can potentially aid guidelines for gene panel testing, risk prediction, and variant classification and guide targeted screening strategies.
Highlights
For ATM variants, the association was strongest for the hormone receptor (HR)+ERBB2− high-grade subtype (OR, 4.99; 95% CI, 3.68-6.76)
Associations between BRCA2 protein-truncating variants (PTVs) and intrinsic subtypes were more homogeneous across subtypes, with higher odds ratios (ORs) associated with HR+ERBB2− high-grade disease (OR, 11.53; 95% CI, 8.92-14.90) and triple negative (TN) tumors (OR, 10.07; 95% CI, 7.61-13.32)
CHEK2 PTVs were associated with similar ORs with all subtypes except TN, for which there was no evidence of association
Summary
Studies and Inclusion Criteria The BRIDGES study included women with BC and unaffected control participants who were participating in the Breast Cancer Association Consortium (https://bcac.ccge.medschl.cam. ac.uk/; eTable 1 in Supplement 1). The analyses presented in this article are based on cases from the subset of populationbased or hospital-based studies that were sampled independently of family history, together with populationmatched control participants (38 studies). Women aged between 18 and 79 years were included. Pathology information from the first primary invasive BC was considered. Cases in which the index tumor was the second tumor and patients with metastases at initial diagnosis were excluded.[12] All studies were approved by the relevant ethical review boards, and participants provided written informed consent
Published Version (
Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have