Pathologic response rates between gemcitabine-cisplatin (GC) and methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin hydrochloride, and cisplatin (MVAC) neoadjuvant chemotherapy in muscle-invasive urothelial cell carcinoma of the bladder.

Abstract

267 Background: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for muscle invasive urothelial carcinoma (UC) of the bladder is associated with higher rates of pathologic complete response (CR) and improved disease-specific survival compared to those treated with radical cystectomy (RC) alone. Two standard regimens used are (1) gemcitabine and cisplatin (GC); and (2) methotrexate, vinblastine, adriamycin, and cisplatin (MVAC), with debate on whether there is a difference in clinical efficacy. In this analysis, we compare the pathologic outcomes at cystectomy between neoadjuvant GC and MVAC treatment. Methods: Data was retrospectively collected on patients with T2-T4 UC of the bladder who underwent RC between Sept 2003 and December 2011 at the University of Washington. Clinical and pathologic factors were recorded along with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and comorbidities. Pathologic outcomes included those with CR (pT0) and near CR (nCR = pT0/Ta/Tis). Odds ratio (OR) for CR and nCR were calculated using multivariate logistic regression adjusting for demographic (age, gender, race), medical (creatinine, diabetes mellitus, cardiac disease) and clinical factors (clinical T stage, prior BCG therapy, complete tumor debulking prior to chemotherapy). Results: A total of 78 patients received GC or MVAC neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by RC, including 46 who received GC and 32 who received MVAC. There was no difference in gender, renal function, cardiac disease or clinical stage between the two groups. Patients over 70 years of age primarily received GC (17/18). CR was achieved in 30% and 25% (p = 0.15) of GC and MVAC patients, respectively (multivariate OR 0.42, 95% CI 0.11-1.63). nCR was more common in those receiving GC (50% vs. 38%, p = 0.04) although non-significant in the multivariate model (OR 0.30, 95% CI 0.07-1.16). Conclusions: We observed similar pathologic response rates for GC and MVAC neoadjuvant chemotherapy in this cohort of bladder cancer patients. These observations support the use of GC as an alternative regimen in the neoadjuvant setting.