Abstract

Insect societies have developed sanitary strategies, one of which is the avoidance of infectious food resources as a primary line of defence. Using binary choices, we investigated whether Myrmica rubra ants can identify prey that has been artificially infected with the entomopathogenic fungus, Metarhizium brunneum. We compared the ants' foraging behaviour towards infected prey at three different stages of fungus development: (i) prey covered with fungal conidia, (ii) prey freshly killed by the fungus and (iii) sporulating prey. Most foragers retrieved a corpse covered with a high number of spores but they consistently avoided a sporulating prey and collected less prey that had recently died from fungal infection. Furthermore, ant responses were highly variable, with some individuals retrieving the first prey they encountered while others inspected both available prey before making a decision. Workers were not repelled by the simple presence of fungal conidia but nevertheless, they avoided retrieving cadavers at later stages of fungal infection. We discuss how these different avoidance responses could be related to: differences in the ants’ perceptive abilities; physico-chemical cues characterizing fungus-infected prey or in the existence of physiological or behavioural defences that limit sanitary risks associated with potentially contaminated resources.

Highlights

  • Animals living in groups are exposed to higher risks of disease and transmission of parasites between group members [1]

  • The overall percentage of ants retrieving a prey decreased to 53% when one of the flies had its body covered with a high amount of conidia (Ctrl–HC condition) and to 60% when one just died from fungal infection (Ctrl–fungus-killed prey (FKill) condition)

  • This decreased retrieval of prey became even more pronounced as soon as workers faced a binary choice that included a sporulating prey. In these two latter cases, the percentage of ants taking a prey dropped to 35% and 39%, respectively, and were significantly lower than those obtained for all the other experimental conditions (χ2 pairwise comparisons: all p-values < 0.05) except when comparing with the Control prey (Ctrl)–HC condition (χ2 pairwise comparisons: Ctrl–HC versus Ctrl–Spo: p = 1; Ctrl–HC versus Decaying prey (Dc)–Spo: p = 0.68; electronic supplementary material, table S3)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Animals living in groups are exposed to higher risks of disease and transmission of parasites between group members [1] This is the case for insect societies where the spreading of pathogens is facilitated by frequent contacts or food exchanges between closely related workers that live together in confined nesting sites [1,2,3,4]. Insect societies have developed effective defence mechanisms at the group level which reduce sanitary risks [5] and which complement the physiological defences existing at the level of the individuals. The level of avoidance can differ quantitatively depending on the concentration and virulence of pathogens [25] and on some life-history traits of ant species [20]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call