Abstract

Collective action among resource users has long been identified as a basic element of successful common pool governance, and one of the main concerns of common pool research is the identification of factors that affect collective action. Among the most commonly identified factors are trust, social capital, common preferences, shared knowledge, collaborative experiences, focusing events and expectations of future interactions. Thus far, however, relatively little attention has been paid to the historical-institutional context of collective action and the constraining effects of path dependency. Path dependency suggests that investments and adaptations in early resource management institutions can make it difficult for actors to abandon these institutions, thereby influencing and shaping subsequent collective action efforts. This article examines the impact that path dependency can have on collective action in common pools, by examining transboundary water management in the Murray-Darling Basin of Australia, the Colorado Basin of the US and the Saskatchewan-Nelson Basin of Canada. In all three cases, early transboundary water apportionment institutions have proven strongly path dependent, significantly shaping subsequent collective action efforts at transboundary water conservation.

Highlights

  • Collective action among resource users has long been identified as a basic element of successful common pool governance, and one of the main concerns of common pool research is the identification of factors that affect collective action

  • This paper offers a longitudinal comparison of basin-wide collective action in the governance of water resources in the MurrayDarling Basin of Australia, the Colorado Basin of the United States, and the Saskatchewan-Nelson Basin of Canada

  • Among the cases examined in this article, the political resilience of early apportionment institutions has been universal, manifesting itself as path dependent water governance in three ways

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Collective action among resource users has long been identified as a basic element of successful common pool governance, and one of the main concerns of common pool research is the identification of factors that affect collective action. This article examines the impact that path dependency can have on collective action in common pools, suggesting that it should be added to the list of factors outlined above To explore this assertion, this paper offers a longitudinal comparison of basin-wide collective action in the governance of water resources in the MurrayDarling Basin of Australia, the Colorado Basin of the United States, and the Saskatchewan-Nelson Basin of Canada. This paper offers a longitudinal comparison of basin-wide collective action in the governance of water resources in the MurrayDarling Basin of Australia, the Colorado Basin of the United States, and the Saskatchewan-Nelson Basin of Canada These cases have been selected using a ‘most different’ comparative approach which attempts to show the ‘apportionment to conservation’ development path in different cases from different parts of the world. Section three offers some concluding observations and suggestions for further work in this area

Common pool governance institutions and path dependency
Path dependency in three semi-arid river basins
Murray-Darling Basin
The Colorado River Basin
The Saskatchewan-Nelson Basin
Conclusions
Literature cited
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call