Abstract

This article relates to the question of whether or to what extent identity is wholly constructed through language by engaging in a discussion of how the use of the past enters into the construction of communal identity. It argues that in order to understand why collective memory and the mythical narrativisation of the past which it frames are such powerful elements in the construction of collective identities, it must be distinguished from the science of historiography. But neither can collective memory be thought of as a communal analogue to the individual mental process of remembering. Rather it is a specific kind of discourse whose subject-position is endowed with a number of distinct privileges (different from those in the discourse of modern historiography) and through which a community can approach and articulate its past in mythical narratives whose ‘validity’ in fact has little to do with the extent to which they mirror ‘historical reality’.

Highlights

  • This article relates to the question of whether or to what extent identity is wholly constructed through language by engaging in a discussion of how the use of the past enters into the construction of communal identity

  • In order to understand why collective memory and the mythical narrativisation of the past which it frames, are such powerful elements in the construction of collective identities, it must be distinguished from the science of historiography

  • I will argue that collective memory should not be thought of as a communal analogue to the individual mental process of remembering, but rather as a specific kind of discourse, whose subjectposition is endowed with a number of distinct privileges and through which, a community can approach and articulate its past in mythical narratives whose ‘validity’ has little to do with the extent to which they mirror ‘historical reality’

Read more

Summary

Introduction

This article relates to the question of whether or to what extent identity is wholly constructed through language by engaging in a discussion of how the use of the past enters into the construction of communal identity. What we mean when speaking of collective memory is the articulation of past events in the mode of recollecting them, and in a way which posits the community as the subject contemplating its meaning through the recalling of its past.

Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.