Abstract
To improve upon current FAA noise policy, it seems reasonable to consider supplemental metrics. One of these is to include the annoyance impacts of low-frequency noise (LFN). It is established that LFN can cause rattle in homes near airports, causing annoyance. Current DNL 65 does not address LFN. In fact, most acoustical measurements do not include low frequencies due to the limitations of inexpensive measurement equipment. Hence, the FAA is genuinely missing these impacts from a physics point of view. The FAA has already paid for a very high quality LFN study through Project 1 in the PARTNER Center of Excellence (predecessor of the current ASCENT center). That project completed in 2007. The present author was not a participant in PARTNER Project 1, but he closely observed the amazing work done by the investigators from The Pennsylvania State University, Purdue University, and the University of Central Florida. If sufficient LFN data is regularly obtained at larger airports with improved noise monitoring equipment, then FAA could include supplemental metrics, such as the number of low-frequency noise events in a given period. [Work supported by the Penn State College of Engineering and its United Technologies Corporation Professorship.]
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: INTER-NOISE and NOISE-CON Congress and Conference Proceedings
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.