Abstract
Cultural ecosystem services are gaining increasing attention in the scientific literature, despite the conceptual and methodological difficulties associated with their assessment. We used a participatory GIS method to map and assess three cultural ecosystem services, namely, (a) outdoor recreation, (b) aesthetic enjoyment, and (c) sense of place, in the Madrid region (Spain). The main goal of the study was to identify cultural ecosystem service hotspots in the region and to explore the relationships among the three ecosystem services mapped. We developed a Maptionnaire online questionnaire asking participants to locate places that they associate with these three ecosystem services and their main reasons for choosing those places on a map. We collected 580 complete questionnaires with 1710 location points (807 for outdoor recreation, 506 for aesthetic enjoyment and 397 for sense of place). We found that the three ecosystem services analysed were spatially correlated, with similar hotspots appearing across the region. Most of the identified hotspots were located in the northern part of the region, which is characterised by mountains and forests. Other hotspots appeared within the city of Madrid, highlighting the importance of urban green areas. Natural protected areas supplied significantly more cultural ecosystem services than non-protected areas. Among CORINE land-use types, forested areas, mountain shrubs and rocky landscapes were more relevant than arable lands for the supply of cultural ecosystem services. Our results highlight the utmost importance of including ecosystem services mapping within land-use planning and policy-making agendas to ensure the conservation of areas supplying cultural services that are critical for societal wellbeing.
Highlights
In recent years, following the creation of the Intergovernmental Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES), the ecosystem services concept has gained great attention in the scientific and political arenas [1,2]
We used a distance of 500 m, which resulted in 7583 points
This is consistent with the high spatial correlation observed among the three Cultural ecosystem services (CES) in this study, which is in line with the results of previous research [7,23,34,35], for outdoor recreation and aesthetic enjoyment [7]
Summary
In recent years, following the creation of the Intergovernmental Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES), the ecosystem services concept has gained great attention in the scientific and political arenas [1,2]. The economic valuation of CES fails to connect management decisions with non-instrumental values, such as relational values linked with landscape stewardship [5,6]. To solve this problem, alternative non-monetary metrics, such as the spatial representation of CES through participatory mapping, have been proposed. Alternative non-monetary metrics, such as the spatial representation of CES through participatory mapping, have been proposed In this way, much weight has been placed on CES over
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary 
Published Version (
Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call