Partial safety factor calibration using surrogate models: An application for running safety of ballasted high-speed railway bridges

Abstract

Traditionally, regulations employ semi-probabilistic methods with partial safety factors to control design limits. Calibrating these partial safety factors involves estimating the target reliability level and optimizing the partial safety factor values in order to minimize the deviation of the safety index between the considered design scenarios and the target value. This procedure necessitates performing a demanding amount of reliability analyses and is often carried out for simplified design situations. Therefore, high computational costs must be accepted for design problems formulated with complex computational models. This study implements a meta-modeling approach based on active learning in the partial safety calibration procedure, enabling its application to computationally intensive problems. Subsequently, the approach is applied to the running safety of ballasted high-speed railway bridges. This limit state implicitly accounts for the phenomenon of ballast destabilization, the occurrence of which disturbs the load path from the rail level to the bridge structure. The dramatic increase in train operating speeds in recent decades has increased the possibility of this design limit state being violated due to resonance. Despite the evident safety concerns, the adopted safety factors appear to be solely based on engineering judgments rather than calibration through higher-level reliability analysis. Therefore, the proposed calibration method is employed to determine the corresponding partial safety factors for various maximum allowable operating train speeds. The newly calibrated partial safety factors allow for a permissible maximum vertical acceleration of the bridge deck approximately 25% higher than the conventional design approaches. Therefore, incorporating these factors into the design procedure may lead to the construction of lighter bridges.