Abstract

Climate change is a central topic of concern for EU international diplomacy and is the site of increased politicization globally. Concomitantly, a parallel process of parliamentarization of the EU has unfolded. Whilst the European Parliament (EP) has enjoyed significant powers in internal policy-making on climate change, since the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty in 2009 the EP has gained the right to veto the EU’s ratification of international (climate change) agreements. This development raises questions about our understanding of the EP as an actor in international climate diplomacy that this article addresses through the following research question: What impact have the increased powers of the EP had on its involvement in UN climate diplomacy? We analyze the EP’s evolving role in international climate diplomacy through an evaluation of its policy preferences prior to international climate conferences (COPs) and its activities during those meetings. We find evidence that the EP’s preferences have become more moderate over time, and that it is also more active at COPs and increasingly engaged with a range of more important actors. However, we find little evidence that the EP’s involvement in international negotiations is significantly different when it holds a veto power, which we attribute to a willingness to depoliticize internal EU climate negotiations to secure policy gains at the international level.

Highlights

  • The European Parliament (EP) has gradually become an important and influential actor in shaping the EU’s internal climate policies

  • In doing so we contribute to the literatures on the parliamentarization of external EU policy-making, the rational choice institutionalist scholarship on the empowerment of the EP, works on international climate diplomacy and we contribute to a better understanding of how the politicization of climate change at the international level has shaped the EP’s positioning on the issue

  • The EP has used its ex post veto power to reject the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA) and the Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunications (SWIFT) Agreement (Monar, 2010; Ripoll Servent, 2014). Given this new power we ask: What impact have the increased powers of the EP had on its involvement in UN climate diplomacy? We examine that involvement by analyzing the activities of the EP before and during international climate negotiations

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The European Parliament (EP) has gradually become an important and influential actor in shaping the EU’s internal climate policies. The recognition of the EP by the other institutions has been driven by both legitimacy concerns (Rosén, 2015) and the wish to strengthen the EU’s negotiation position at the international level (Rosén, 2016) This discussion leads us to expect that the empowerment of the EP will have two types of effect on its ex ante and ad locum involvement in international climate negotiations: a changing involvement over time; and an amplified impact in the context of COPs where the consent procedure applies for the ratification of an international climate treaty. COP outcomes are legally binding, which makes it likely that the ‘shadow of the consent procedure’ affected the EP involvement One reason for this expectation relates to the politicization of the wider climate change agenda. The shadow of consent is likely to affect the number, nature, and intensity of the EP’s activities in its ad locum involvement

Ex ante Involvement
Ad Locum Involvement
Findings
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call