Abstract
This study presents a parametric neutronic evaluation of different candidate claddings for a purposed candidate fuel (Th-233U-235U)O2 in an advanced dual-cooled annular PWR assembly. The investigated claddings include Zircaloy-2/4, zirconium carbide (ZrC), silicon carbide (SiC), ferritic Fe-20Cr-5Al (FeCrAl) and APMT alloys, and austenitic 310 (SS-310), compared to the by design cladding for the AP1000 assembly, Zirlo™. Neutronic calculations were performed using the deterministic code DRAGON, and the parameters included infinite multiplication factor, criticality periods, neutron flux spectra, radial power distributions, rim effects, and reactivity feedback coefficients.The results show that the candidate fuel with Zirlo™ achieves a higher criticality period than UO2 fuel in both solid and annular configurations. The candidate fuel with SS-310 cladding exhibits a higher criticality period penalty of about 12.60% compared to Zirlo™, APMT, and FeCrAl claddings show a criticality period penalty of about 10.94% and 8.79%, respectively. The candidate fuel with ceramic claddings, SiC and ZrC, can achieve slightly higher criticality periods compared to Zirlo™ of about 1.11% and 0.24%, respectively, due to their low thermal neutron absorption cross-sections. Regarding the power profile, the annular (Th-233U-235U)O2 fuel exhibits a flatter behavior compared to UO2 fuel. However, the claddings with lower capture cross-sections exhibit slightly increased fission power through the fuel pellet. The fuel temperature coefficient for candidate fuel exhibits more negative values as the capture cross-section of the cladding increases, while the molybdenum and zirconium-containing claddings exhibit more favorable moderator temperature coefficients.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call