Abstract
Phase-field modeling has increasingly been used to study microstructural evolution in fission gas bubbles in nuclear fuel to improve understanding of fission gas release. To improve computational efficiency, often only vacancies and gas atoms are included as defect species. In this case, the net effects of vacancy and interstitial production, recombination, and biased sink absorption are included as a net vacancy source, or net vacancy source combined with an effective sink. However, there has been a lack of clarity on what parameter values should be used for these approaches to best match the more complete physical picture that includes interstitials and vacancies. Here, we compare a phase-field model of void growth to analytical models for the source-only and source plus sink approach to gain insight into how the phase-field models can be parameterized effectively. The source-only approach provides greater flexibility to match growth rates determined from the full vacancy-interstitial picture. A strategy was developed for determining the value of the net vacancy source term by comparing to an analytical model that includes vacancy and interstitial production, recombination, and biased sink absorption. This strategy can be used to parameterize phase-field models of fission gas bubble growth.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.